|
columns in date order (most recent first):
Left
or right
Interruptions
Sequences
Infra-red
Information
technology
Broadcasting
Funny
noises
Goodbye
Off and
on
Documentaries
Real time
Flexible
systems
Forms
A user
group of two
People
flow
Loops
Take-out
service
Stereo
vision
International
standards
Contact
Blank
Sound
Terminology
Specifications
Junk
Marks
and scratches
Paths
Telephones
Length
Pointing
Video
Video conferencing
Shopping
Slider controls
Snooze functions
Cafés
Safety
catches
Powerful
functions
Children
Food
Waiting
Labels
Elavators
Buttons
Coffee
|
These
columns discuss interaction design in the world around us. You can
find more of them in the book Designing
the Real World
A
friend of mine almost succeeded in blowing me up last time she visited
us. It was accidental of course, and it is directly connected to user
interface design. It all has to do with the knobs for controlling
the gas burners on our cooker. In Britain turning the knob anti-clockwise
takes the burner from the ‘off’ state to ‘on-low’
(simmering) and turning it further increases the gas making the flames
hotter until at the end the burner is on full. This is a similar situation
to combined on/off volume controls on radios; you turn the dial taking
it from ‘off’ to ‘on-low’ and through to ‘on-high’.
Contrast this to gas knobs in some other European countries where the sequence is, ‘off’ to ‘on-full’, and then down to ‘on-low’; the simmering state is right at the end of the range instead of at the beginning.
This has the advantage that you can quickly turn the knob into the simmer state while cooking, without the danger of it slipping into the off state if you go to far. The disadvantage is that due to the inconsistencies in the two systems, visitors from Britain trying to turn the gas off will often turn the knob from ‘on-full’ to ‘simmer’ and because the knob won’t turn any further they then assume it is off. If it is lit it remains burning on simmer, but if for some reason it wasn’t lit then it remains pumping a small stream of gas into the kitchen
In the column on page 88 I discuss snooze functions; states that sit in between two distinct states. Another important concept are states that lie in between two other states but they are all part of a range. The simplest example is the volume knob mentioned above.
Often with such systems there are irregularities introduced in the interaction to isolate key states in the range. The most obvious states are the beginning state and the end state. In some interactions these states are desirable for some reason and so are made difficult to leave. Consider again the gas knob; you usually have to push it in before you turn it on, the state at the beginning of the range (off) is isolated and given a threshold from the rest of the range.
Other examples are car doors; when a door is fully closed it is useful to have it remain in this state while traveling, thus doors have catches to make getting out of this state a threshold action (pretty common sense actually).
Key states in such ranges are not just given a threshold in this way, sometimes the system has a built in tendency to return to the state; doors that tend to close themselves, joysticks that automatically re-center themselves, etc.
The interesting group is ranges where the key state is not at the end or beginning but is an interim state; somewhere in the middle. Consider car doors again; you are very often opening them in cramped situations, parked next to other cars, parked alongside a busy road. In those situations you may want the door open but not open all the way. Many car doors support this by having an interim state built in, a point at which the door can be left half open and it stays half open.
Similar interim states can be found on some hi-fi controls. The balance knob usually has a little tactile ‘bump’ when the balance is equal for the two channels. Some British cookers pick out the simmer state in the range in a similar way.
These interim states are built in, based upon objective ideas as to which states are important to the users. But very often with such ranges the important state is purely subjective and as such cannot be built in. With our electric toaster, the cooking time control has one state which is vital to me; the state for nicely done toast. However this is different to the equivalent state for my girlfriend, sometimes leading to explosions of a different kind in the kitchen!
The only thing that systems can offer to help here are presets; several independent controls for the range and a way of switching between them. Televisions supply you with up to a hundred presets, imagine zapping if you just had one dial like a radio. So, toaster manufacturers are you listening; we’d have a range control for me (that I could set to nicely done toast), and another one for Wendelynne (that she could set to warm, floppy, slightly-singed bread), oh, and a third one for whoever is visiting from Britain. That is if they hadn’t already blown the kitchen up. |
|