|
columns in date order (most recent first):
Left
or right
Interruptions
Sequences
Infra-red
Information
technology
Broadcasting
Funny
noises
Goodbye
Off and
on
Documentaries
Real time
Flexible
systems
Forms
A user
group of two
People
flow
Loops
Take-out
service
Stereo
vision
International
standards
Contact
Blank
Sound
Terminology
Specifications
Junk
Marks
and scratches
Paths
Telephones
Length
Pointing
Video
Video conferencing
Shopping
Slider controls
Snooze functions
Cafés
Safety
catches
Powerful
functions
Children
Food
Waiting
Labels
Elavators
Buttons
Coffee
|
These
columns discuss interaction design in the world around us. You can
find more of them in the book Designing
the Real World
How
many of you have heard of the book ‘Flatland’? Written
in Victorian Britain by Edwin A. Abbott, it tells the story of a two-dimensional
world peopled by shapes. The higher nobility are shapes with lots
of sides, the upper class are pentagons, the middle classes are squares
(real Victorian stuff this!) and the lower classes are triangles,
the lower they are the thinner the triangle, criminals are incredibly
thin triangles, and then the women are straight lines. A wonderful
exercise in two-dimensional topology but a truly sad reflection on
the values of those times.
Thankfully we live in a 3D world (and a world where women have a somewhat
better perception in society). But is it really all that 3D? How often
do we go swooping around in the third dimension? When was the last
time you did a ‘loop the loop’? We actually live a sort
of 'two and a half'-D existence. Confined to live in a thin, 3D layer
occasionally going upstairs to another thin, 3D layer that just happens
to be located above the first.
You can tell we have always been confined to this 'two and a half'-D
existence in the way our ears have evolved. We can gauge direction
with our ears thanks to some complex integration between the signals
reaching both ears. But our ears are separated on the horizontal plain
meaning that we are sensitive to direction on the horizontal plane
but on the vertical plain there is no vertical separation between
our ears and thus we cannot pinpoint vertical direction.
In practical terms what this means is that we get confused when someone
shouts to us from a balcony. We can tell that the shout is coming
from a particular direction but not from how high above the ground
it is coming. One solution to this is to separate out ears in the
vertical plane. This sounds painful but it can be done by the simple
act of tilting our heads to one side. Cats and dogs sometimes tilt
their heads when listening so there could be something in it.
What about eyes? Do they triangulate in the same way? Are our eyes
geared up to life in the plane? Well, due to the difference in velocity
between sound and light they can’t do the same trick that the
ears do, and anyway, they don’t need to. Direction in vision
is implicit, you don’t see something and wonder, ‘Which
direction is that in?’ You can see which direction it is in!
If we can judge direction with just one eye then why do we have two?
One factor is redundancy. One only has to think of Jason and the Cyclops
to realize the drawbacks of monocular vision. But binocular vision
is useful for other things. We get different views from different
eyes and the integration of these two views provides us not with direction
information, but with depth information about what we can see.
That is the key to why our two eyes are next to each other and not
one above the other. We need to see what things are in front of other
things and that depends on how the edges of things overlap each other.
When things are in front of one another they have more edge overlaps
in the vertical plane than in the horizontal plane. In general things
are tall and thin and not short and fat. Think of tree trunks, cliff
walls, people, edges of mammoths etc. Furthermore, those things that
move are usually, like us, confined to moving on the flat, they don’t
go higher or lower but they do go from side to side. And we ourselves
are going to navigate in this plane going in between these things
we can see.
This integration of views from two eyes is just one of the factors
that govern our perception of depth, there are many others. There
are cues that are inherent in the view itself. The loss of detail
and the blue shift of color as things get further away. The brain
is also aware of how much our eyes have to move together when we look
at something. This sense can get confused when we look at patterns
that repeat horizontally like curly telephone cords, mesh fencing
or random dot stereograms, making them look nearer or further away
than they really are. Another small detail that the brain is aware
of is the amount that the eye lens has to stretch to bring something
into focus. Ever seen orange icons on a blue background? The orange
things really do seem to float in front of the blue even though they
are the same distance away. The difference in wavelength between blue
and orange light means that the eye lens has to do different amounts
of stretching to focus them and thus the brain is tricked into perceiving
them as being at different depths.
In conclusion then we have evolved in amazing ways over millions of
years to integrate all sorts of information regarding the world around
us. We have evolved to be almost perfect. All we have to do now is
sort out the last vestiges of that Victorian attitude to women and
we will be there! |
|